The Politics of Oil

New Resources


[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index]

Pentagon Sets Up Intelligence Unit



We were talking about the CIA this mornig but look what is happening -
Rumsfeld wants his own intelligence bureau to feed out info favorable to
his hawks and justify their adventurism. It is a sad day for the
integrity of our intelligence services and for the US government more
generally --CH
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/24/international/24INTE.html
Title: Pentagon Sets Up Intelligence Unit
The New York Times The New York Times International October 24, 2002  

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
- Africa
- Americas
- Asia Pacific
- Europe
- Middle East
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia/Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version

Get SBC Yahoo! DSL Internet access


Find More Low Fares! Experience Orbitz!


$7 Online Market Orders, 165 offices


Small Business Center: OPEN NetworkSM tools


Go to Advanced Search/Archive Go to Advanced Search/Archive Symbol Lookup
Search Optionsdivide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, cmhenry
Today's News Past Week Past 30 Days Past 90 Days Past Year Since 1996

Pentagon Sets Up Intelligence Unit

By ERIC SCHMITT and THOM SHANKER

WASHINGTON, Oct. 23 — Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and his senior advisers have assigned a small intelligence unit to search for information on Iraq's hostile intentions or links to terrorists that the nation's spy agencies may have overlooked, Pentagon officials said today.

Some officials say the creation of the team reflects frustration on the part of Mr. Rumsfeld, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz and other senior officials that they are not receiving undiluted information on the capacities of President Saddam Hussein of Iraq and his suspected ties to terrorist organizations.

Advertisement

If your eyes have changed... shouldn’t your light?

Scientists adapt NASA technology to create "smart bed" sleep surface

Melanin glasses—nature’s solution to hazardous light

Keep your hands on the wheel and let your cell phone take notes

If you don’t back up your hard drive immediately...don’t blame us!

A feature-rich digital camera at a price you can afford

How can they pack this much power and zoom into a binocular this small?

Is someone watching you?




But officials who disagree say the top civilian policy makers are intent on politicizing intelligence to fit their hawkish views on Iraq.

In particular, many in the intelligence agencies disagree that Mr. Hussein can be directly linked to Osama bin Laden and his network, Al Qaeda, or that the two are likely to make common cause against the United States. In addition, the view among even some senior intelligence analysts at the Central Intelligence Agency is that Mr. Hussein is contained and is unlikely to unleash weapons of mass destruction unless he is attacked.

But Mr. Rumsfeld's inner circle of advisers view Mr. Hussein's record, which includes aggression against Kuwait and the use of poison gas against his people, as much more alarming, and they are not willing to risk leaving him in power. They cite numerous intelligence findings indicating links between the Iraq and senior Qaeda leaders.

The four- to five-person intelligence team was established by Douglas J. Feith, the under secretary of defense for policy and another strong advocate for military action against Mr. Hussein. It was formed not long after the Sept. 11 attacks to take on special assignments in the global war on terror.

The team's specialty is using powerful computers and new software to scan and sort documents and reports from the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies.

The team's current task, described by one official as "data mining," is to glean individual details that may collectively point to Iraq's wider connections to terrorism, but which may have been obscured by formal assessments that play down the overall Iraqi threat.

In an interview tonight, Mr. Wolfowitz said the members of the special intelligence team "are helping us sift through enormous amounts of incredibly valuable data that our many intelligence resources have vacuumed up." He emphasized, "They are not making independent intelligence assessments."

He described "a phenomenon in intelligence work, that people who are pursuing a certain hypothesis will see certain facts that others won't, and not see other facts that others will."

"The lens through which you're looking for facts affects what you look for," he added.

But as adherents of different views on the Iraqi threat use intelligence findings to argue their case, Mr. Wolfowitz said, "It should not permit you to create facts or deny facts."

"The correct process is one that surfaces as many facts as possible," he added.

By law, the sprawling American intelligence bureaucracy is managed by the director of central intelligence, George J. Tenet, who also is in charge of the best-known spy organization, the Central Intelligence Agency. Separate intelligence units also are operated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Departments of State, Energy and the Treasury.

But nearly 80 percent of the overall budget for intelligence is within the Defense Department and managed by Mr. Rumsfeld. This classified sum is divided among such organizations as the National Security Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the intelligence arms of the armed services.

Agencies like the N.S.A. and the D.I.A. in effect have two masters, since the defense secretary controls the budget and is a significant client of their information, while the director of central intelligence watches over the entire constellation of spy organizations.

Continued
1 | 2 | Next>>




THREATS AND RESPONSES: THE INTELLIGENCE DISPUTE; C.I.A. REJECTS CALL FOR IRAQ REPORT  (October 3, 2002)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: AIRSTRIKES; U.S. and Iraq Differ Over Results Of Attack on Antiaircraft Site  (September 27, 2002)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: ATLANTIC PARTNERS; NATO Chief Urges Allies Not to Let Iraq Divide Them  (September 26, 2002)  $

PRESIDENT REBUFFS MOVES BY GERMANY TO MEND RELATIONS  (September 24, 2002)  $



Doing research? Search the archive for more than 500,000 articles:
Today's News Past Week Past 30 Days Past 90 Days Past Year Since 1996




E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints
Single-Page View

Wake up to the world with home delivery of The New York Times newspaper.
Click Here for 50% off.


Home | Back to International | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


Copyright The New York Times Company | Permissions | Privacy Policy
E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints
Single-Page View

Standoff With Iraq


Recent Articles

Security Council Gets U.S. Proposal on Disarming Iraq (October 24, 2002)



Topics

 Alerts
Defense Department
Rumsfeld, Donald H
Iraq
United States Politics and Government
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Take a Tour
Sign Up for Newsletters










We’re giving away a fabulous trip for two to Sydney, Melbourne and Cairns, Australia. We've hidden pictures of eight Australian animals somewhere in the pages of the section, find FOUR of these "native Australians," and you could win a vacation to their homeland. Click here and look for Travel Treasure Hunt promotion.











Back to:   The Politics of Oil Main Page