Any policy presumably has some goal
or set of goals and objectives which you need to identify. Are
the goals consistent? In the real world of foreign policy we
may have conflicting objectives. A good policy will try to
reconcile conflicting goals and objectives as best one can.
What are the priorities? Usually in politics people disagree
about priorities. The various groups and organizations involved
in the US foreign policy process may have different assessments
of goals and priorities. You will need to examine them
critically in your policy area.
 
Once the goals and objectives have been critically discussed and
clarified, the policy maker will try to devise a strategy to
meet the goals. Strategies are just means to ends. Getting down
to the practice of politics, you will also be interested in
tactics consistent with implementing the strategy. A foreign
policy, if it is well thought out, will include strategy and
tactics.
 
A strategy may be good in theory but how practical is it? What
are the means needed to implement it? What are the resources
that the policy maker can call upon? These resources may be
military, economic, political, commercial, and sometimes moral
as well. They all boil down to power, but power takes many
forms in the international arena. A major criterion for
evaluating a given policy is whether it can be implemented, i.e.
are the resources available to carry out the policy? Can they
somehow be mobilized? Is the political will available? The task
of political leadership is not only to devise wise policies but
also to mobilize support for them.
 
Who are the critical actors in the policy-making process in your
policy area? Which groups and agencies are critical to the
successful implementation of the policy? How important is
congress and its committees? Pressure groups? The general
American public? Finally, last but not least, how effectively
does the policy address the problem under discussion? The
relevant actors and political realities in the Middle East also
have to be considered.