Lobbies, Media, and Unelected Officials
Cont'd
But first the News:
- Clinton
Starts Mideast Diplomacy With Cash for Gaza, NYT March 2, 2009
- Olmert
Likely to Face Charges in Corruption Case, NYT March 2, 2009
- U.S.
Says Iran Has Material for an Atomic Bomb, NYT March 2, 2009
- Gates
Defends Iraq Withdrawal Plan,
NYT March 2,
2009
- Obama
Offered Deal to Russia in Secret Letter, NYT March 3, 2009
Two years ago
- Iran
and Syria May Join Baghdad Talks NYT
Feb 27, 2007 (online)
- Cheney
Unhurt After Bombing in Afghanistan NYT
Feb 27, 2007 (online)
- Iraqis
Reach an Accord on Oil Revenues NYT Feb
27, 2007
- Seeking
New Israeli Settlers, Synagogue Draws
Protesters NYT Feb 26, 2007
- Seymour M. Hersh, "The
Redirection," New Yorker March 15,
2007
- Peter Galbraith, "The
Surge," New York Review of Books, March 15, 2007
- Zbigniew Brzezinski,
Testimony before Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, Feb 1, 2007 [sorry to be so late on this, but
it just came to my attention and you should read it because
Brzezinski has written one of the books that is assigned reading
in this course --CH]
Seven years ago:
-
Review of Video
3 :
- National Security Advisor (from 40min video
3): From Brzezinski under President Carter to Col. McFarlane and
Adm. Poindexter under Ronald Reagan.
- Iran Contra Case ("Irangate")
- Star Wars and "group think" (relate to your
readings for
this week)
Models of the Foreign Policy
Decision-Making Process: can the US be a rational actor in world
affairs?
- parameters of rational
policy (remember
what a "policy" is supposed to be)
- inputs into
policy-making (recall the
concentric circles)
- can the give-and-take of
the policy process lead to rational policies?
The Rational Actor
Model
Take the decisions concerning US
responses to Sept 11, 2001, summarized in Bob Woodward's series in
the Washington Post: part
1, part
5. Or an example under the Clinton
Administration: US and NATO intervention in Kosevo (NYT 18.6.99)
parts
I - II -III- was there a strategy in pursuit of the US national
interest? Is it in the US national interest to preserve and expand
NATO as an effective military and peace-keeping alliance?
Did President Bush act as a rational actor
responding to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait on Aug 2, 1990?
What do you make of the present Obama
Administration's policies toward Iran, Iraq, and Israel? Of possible
divisions between the Defense Department and the State Department?
Of divisions among Democrats in Congress?
The Bureaucratic Politics Model
bureaucratic/governmental politics
models vs rational actor model (unless any outcome is "rational" - as
a Hegelian might argue): crisis strategic vs intermestic
issues..need to relate the decision-making
model to the kind of policy issue under discussion.
Energy policy illustrating intermestic issues...cf
Jimmy Carter's MEW ("moral equivalent of war") speech in your
presidency video but 83 cttees and subcttees of House were involved
in 1977-78! (worse than tax reform!)
"Groupthink"
Good examples would include Reagan's
"Star Wars" decision (in the Power Game No. 3 video - here is
an
update with new
tests planned) and Irangate (Moyers
video). How much room for discussion and disagreement is there within
the current Obama Administration? Critical role of the National
Security Advisor?
Elite Theory:
- Class interests? Ivy League? Wall St.
lawyers? "What's good for General Motors is good for the USA."
Neo-Cons under the Bush Administration - a coherent
ideology?
Interest Group Politics - lobbies, eg. China
Lobby, AIPAC
Ethnic lobbies, as we have seen, also
media like NYT columnist Bill Safire, who discouraged Bobby Inman
from being Secretary of Defense in the Second Clinton Administration
(Inman had stopped leaks to Israeli intelligence after Israel's
bombing of Osirak, Baghdad, in 1981 - and producing Jonathan
Pollard)
- Social constructivism
- How was Noriega's image changed from
anti-Communist crusader to drug dealer? Usama Bin Laden as Robin
Hood? (depending on who is doing the constructing).
-
- Prospect Theory
- When winning, be risk averse: prefer $100 to a
50% chance of winning $200; but take risks to avoid losses even if
you risk losing more: prefer 50% of losing $200 to a certain loss
of $100.
From last time: just how
influential is the "Israel Lobby"?
- role of AIPAC since 1970s: in Congress -
funding and information
- Israel and US presidents since LBJ (1963-68) -
G.W.H. Bush was the big exception: Rejecting AIPAC pressures to
preserve the Arab coalition 1990-91 to liberate Kuwait
- influence on the Executive branch (recall
those concentric
circles) - here is a detailed very
recent illustration pitting NSC deputy advisor Elliott Abrams vs.
Condi Rice concerning Israeli-Palestinian relations:
- presidential elections: ritual homage to
Israel (US Embassy to Jerusalem)
- Lobby or "group think" and a bit of racism? -
raising the issue has been a loser
- current developments
-
Main page | classes
| syllabus
March 2, 2009
- Department
of Government, College
of Liberal Arts, University of Texas at
Austin.
- Questions, Comments, and Suggestions to
chenry@mail.utexas.edu