Le Monde diplomatique
-----------------------------------------------------
 
September 2008
 
ZIONIST NATIONALIST MYTH OF ENFORCED EXILE
 
Israel deliberately forgets its history
___________________________________________________________
 
An Israeli historian suggests the diaspora was the consequence,
not of the expulsion of the Hebrews from Palestine, but of
proselytising across north Africa, southern Europe and the
Middle East
 
by Schlomo Sand
___________________________________________________________
 
Every Israeli knows that he or she is the direct and
exclusive descendant of a Jewish people which has existed
since it received the Torah (1) in Sinai. According to this
myth, the Jews escaped from Egypt and settled in the Promised
Land, where they built the glorious kingdom of David and
Solomon, which subsequently split into the kingdoms of Judah
and Israel. They experienced two exiles: after the
destruction of the first temple, in the 6th century BC, and
of the second temple, in 70 AD.
 
Two thousand years of wandering brought the Jews to Yemen,
Morocco, Spain, Germany, Poland and deep into Russia. But,
the story goes, they always managed to preserve blood links
between their scattered communities. Their uniqueness was
never compromised.
 
At the end of the 19th century conditions began to favour
their return to their ancient homeland. If it had not been
for the Nazi genocide, millions of Jews would have fulfilled
the dream of 20 centuries and repopulated Eretz Israel, the
biblical land of Israel. Palestine, a virgin land, had been
waiting for its original inhabitants to return and awaken it.
It belonged to the Jews, rather than to an Arab minority that
had no history and had arrived there by chance. The wars in
which the wandering people reconquered their land were just;
the violent opposition of the local population was criminal.
 
This interpretation of Jewish history was developed as
talented, imaginative historians built on surviving fragments
of Jewish and Christian religious memory to construct a
continuous genealogy for the Jewish people. Judaism's
abundant historiography encompasses many different
approaches.
 
But none have ever questioned the basic concepts developed in
the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Discoveries that
might threaten this picture of a linear past were
marginalised. The national imperative rejected any
contradiction of or deviation from the dominant story.
University departments exclusively devoted to "the history of
the Jewish people", as distinct from those teaching what is
known in Israel as general history, made a significant
contribution to this selective vision. The debate on what
constitutes Jewishness has obvious legal implications, but
historians ignored it: as far as they are concerned, any
descendant of the people forced into exile 2,000 years ago is
a Jew.
 
Nor did these official investigators of the past join the
controversy provoked by the "new historians" from the late
1980s. Most of the limited number of participants in this
public debate were from other disciplines or non-academic
circles: sociologists, orientalists, linguists, geographers,
political scientists, literary academics and archaeologists
developed new perspectives on the Jewish and Zionist past.
Departments of Jewish history remained defensive and
conservative, basing themselves on received ideas. While
there have been few significant developments in national
history over the past 60 years (a situation unlikely to
change in the short term), the facts that have emerged face
any honest historian with fundamental questions.
 
Founding myths shaken
 
Is the Bible a historical text? Writing during the early half
of the 19th century, the first modern Jewish historians, such
as Isaak Markus Jost (1793-1860) and Leopold Zunz
(1794-1886), did not think so. They regarded the Old
Testament as a theological work reflecting the beliefs of
Jewish religious communities after the destruction of the
first temple. It was not until the second half of the century
that Heinrich Graetz (1817-91) and others developed a
"national" vision of the Bible and transformed Abraham's
journey to Canaan, the flight from Egypt and the united
kingdom of David and Solomon into an authentic national past.
By constant repetition, Zionist historians have subsequently
turned these Biblical "truths" into the basis of national
education.
 
But during the 1980s an earthquake shook these founding
myths. The discoveries made by the "new archaeology"
discredited a great exodus in the 13th century BC. Moses
could not have led the Hebrews out of Egypt into the Promised
Land, for the good reason that the latter was Egyptian
territory at the time. And there is no trace of either a
slave revolt against the pharaonic empire or of a sudden
conquest of Canaan by outsiders.
 
Nor is there any trace or memory of the magnificent kingdom
of David and Solomon. Recent discoveries point to the
existence, at the time, of two small kingdoms: Israel, the
more powerful, and Judah, the future Judea. The general
population of Judah did not go into 6th century BC exile:
only its political and intellectual elite were forced to
settle in Babylon. This decisive encounter with Persian
religion gave birth to Jewish monotheism.
 
Then there is the question of the exile of 70 AD. There has
been no real research into this turning point in Jewish
history, the cause of the diaspora. And for a simple reason:
the Romans never exiled any nation from anywhere on the
eastern seaboard of the Mediterranean. Apart from enslaved
prisoners, the population of Judea continued to live on their
lands, even after the destruction of the second temple. Some
converted to Christianity in the 4th century, while the
majority embraced Islam during the 7th century Arab conquest.
 
Most Zionist thinkers were aware of this: Yitzhak Ben Zvi,
later president of Israel, and David Ben Gurion, its first
prime minister, accepted it as late as 1929, the year of the
great Palestinian revolt. Both stated on several occasions
that the peasants of Palestine were the descendants of the
inhabitants of ancient Judea (2).
 
Proselytising zeal
 
But if there was no exile after 70 AD, where did all the Jews
who have populated the Mediterranean since antiquity come
from? The smokescreen of national historiography hides an
astonishing reality. From the Maccabean revolt of the mid-2nd
century BC to the Bar Kokhba revolt of the 2nd century AD,
Judaism was the most actively proselytising religion. The
Judeo-Hellenic Hasmoneans forcibly converted the Idumeans of
southern Judea and the Itureans of Galilee and incorporated
them into the people of Israel. Judaism spread across the
Middle East and round the Mediterranean. The 1st century AD
saw the emergence in modern Kurdistan of the Jewish kingdom
of Adiabene, just one of many that converted.
 
The writings of Flavius Josephus are not the only evidence of
the proselytising zeal of the Jews. Horace, Seneca, Juvenal
and Tacitus were among the Roman writers who feared it. The
Mishnah and the Talmud (3) authorised conversion, even if the
wise men of the Talmudic tradition expressed reservations in
the face of the mounting pressure from Christianity.
 
Although the early 4th century triumph of Christianity did
not mark the end of Jewish expansion, it relegated Jewish
proselytism to the margins of the Christian cultural world.
During the 5th century, in modern Yemen, a vigorous Jewish
kingdom emerged in Himyar, whose descendants preserved their
faith through the Islamic conquest and down to the present
day. Arab chronicles tell of the existence, during the 7th
century, of Judaised Berber tribes; and at the end of the
century the legendary Jewish queen Dihya contested the Arab
advance into northwest Africa. Jewish Berbers participated in
the conquest of the Iberian peninsula and helped establish
the unique symbiosis between Jews and Muslims that
characterised Hispano-Arabic culture.
 
The most significant mass conversion occurred in the 8th
century, in the massive Khazar kingdom between the Black and
Caspian seas. The expansion of Judaism from the Caucasus into
modern Ukraine created a multiplicity of communities, many of
which retreated from the 13th century Mongol invasions into
eastern Europe. There, with Jews from the Slavic lands to the
south and from what is now modern Germany, they formed the
basis of Yiddish culture (4).
 
Prism of Zionism
 
Until about 1960 the complex origins of the Jewish people
were more or less reluctantly acknowledged by Zionist
historiography. But thereafter they were marginalised and
finally erased from Israeli public memory. The Israeli forces
who seized Jerusalem in 1967 believed themselves to be the
direct descendents of the mythic kingdom of David rather than
- God forbid - of Berber warriors or Khazar horsemen. The
Jews claimed to constitute a specific ethnic group that had
returned to Jerusalem, its capital, from 2,000 years of exile
and wandering.
 
This monolithic, linear edifice is supposed to be supported
by biology as well as history. Since the 1970s supposedly
scientific research, carried out in Israel, has desperately
striven to demonstrate that Jews throughout the world are
closely genetically related.
 
Research into the origins of populations now constitutes a
legitimate and popular field in molecular biology and the
male Y chromosome has been accorded honoured status in the
frenzied search for the unique origin of the "chosen people".
The problem is that this historical fantasy has come to
underpin the politics of identity of the state of Israel. By
validating an essentialist, ethnocentric definition of
Judaism it encourages a segregation that separates Jews from
non-Jews - whether Arabs, Russian immigrants or foreign
workers.
 
Sixty years after its foundation, Israel refuses to accept
that it should exist for the sake of its citizens. For almost
a quarter of the population, who are not regarded as Jews,
this is not their state legally. At the same time, Israel
presents itself as the homeland of Jews throughout the world,
even if these are no longer persecuted refugees, but the full
and equal citizens of other countries.
 
A global ethnocracy invokes the myth of the eternal nation,
reconstituted on the land of its ancestors, to justify
internal discrimination against its own citizens. It will
remain difficult to imagine a new Jewish history while the
prism of Zionism continues to fragment everything into an
ethnocentric spectrum. But Jews worldwide have always tended
to form religious communities, usually by conversion; they
cannot be said to share an ethnicity derived from a unique
origin and displaced over 20 centuries of wandering.
 
The development of historiography and the evolution of
modernity were consequences of the invention of the nation
state, which preoccupied millions during the 19th and 20th
centuries. The new millennium has seen these dreams begin to
shatter.
 
And more and more academics are analysing, dissecting and
deconstructing the great national stories, especially the
myths of common origin so dear to chroniclers of the past.
 
Shlomo Sand is professor of history at Tel Aviv university
and the author of Comment le people juif fut inventé (Fayard,
Paris, 2008)
________________________________________________________
 
(1) The Torah, from the Hebrew root yara (to teach) is the
founding text of Judaism. It consists of the first five books
of the Old Testament (the Pentateuch): Genesis, Exodus,
Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
 
(2) See David Ben Gurion and Yitzhak Ben Zvi, Eretz Israel in
the past and present, 1918 (in Yiddish), and Jerusalem, 1980
(in Hebrew); Yitzhak Ben Zvi, Our population in the country,
Executive Committee of the Union for Youth and the Jewish
National Fund, Warsaw, 1929 (in Hebrew).
 
(3) The Mishnah, regarded as the first work of rabbinic
literature, was drawn up around 200 AD. The Talmud is a
synthesis of rabbinic discussions on the law, customs and
history of the Jews. The Palestinian Talmud was written
between the 3rd and 5th centuries; the Babylonian Talmud was
compiled at the end of the 5th century.
 
(4) Yiddish, spoken by the Jews of eastern Europe, was a
Germano-Slavic language incorporating Hebrew words.
 
 
 
Translated by Donald Hounam
 
 
________________________________________________________
 
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 1997-2008 Le Monde diplomatique
 
<http://MondeDiplo.com/2008/09/07israel>