3-1: CRITIQUES DUE BY MIDNIGHT SATURDAY
--you use the "comment" option to post your critique--
NO CHANCE TO MAKE THIS UP AFTER 3-1, BECAUSE YOUR CRITIQUES ARE OF NO USE TO OTHERS AFTER THEY HAVE WRITTEN THEIR PAPERS. YOUR COLLEAGUES ARE RELYING ON YOU: DON'T LET THEM DOWN.
You don't have to critique everyone. You can do the minimum of five if you want.
REQUIREMENTS: In the case of categories ^ and O, if no one else has done so, and the revision needs to be higher than the sentence level, then explain what you would do instead of rewriting a sentence. If the revisions needed are between sentences suggest transitions. If the problem is in the logic of individual sentences, revise as needed. Otherwise, this is the process:
[1] You choose an author and then a sentence no one else has rewritten for one of the three categories marked for improvement for that author.
[2] You QUOTE the relevant advice in our anthology( PP. 1261-1318) for this category that best fits this sentence (supply the page no. from the anthology).
[3] Then you proceed to rewrite the sentence accordingly to help the author improve in that category.
[4] Then you go to another author and repeat the process. After you have done so with all the authors, you can start a second round, and even a third round after that, but each sentence must be one no one else has revised.
GRADING OF YOUR REWRITES FOR OTHERS: FROM THREE TO SIX POINTS FOR EACH SENTENCE REVISION, DEPENDING ON QUALITY.
TO GET CREDIT FOR YOUR CRITIQUES YOU MUST PUT ALL YOUR EVALUATIONS INTO A SINGLE WORD DOCUMENT (INCLUDING, OF COURSE, THE NAME OF EACH STUDENT YOU EVALUATED AT THE TOP OF THAT CRITIQUE). PRINT OUT THIS DOCUMENT AND HAND IT IN TO THE INSTRUCTOR WHEN YOU GET A CHANCE.
NAME ON THE LEFT, below "PROJECT BY" = subject of peer critique, THAT IS, = THE ESSAY YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO CRITIQUE
Next three columns to the right = categories of your critique
Final five columns to the right: who is assigned to critique that project
|
PROJECT
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
(S) DOLPHIN | LIONESS
|
OTTER
|
(M) DOLPHIN
|
BEAR
|
||
|
MALE LION
BENJAMIN; CHRISTIAN M.
|
|
|
|
(F)DOLPHIN | (S) DOLPHIN | LIONESS
|
(M) DOLPHIN
|
BEAR
|
||
|
SPIDER
COHEN, ETHAN
|
|
|
|
(F)DOLPHIN | (S) DOLPHIN | LIONESS
|
RED WOLF
|
ELEPHANT
|
||
|
HUMMINGBIRD
KATLEMAN; MADELINE R.
|
|
|
|
(F)DOLPHIN | (S) DOLPHIN | LIONESS
|
RED WOLF
|
ELEPHANT
|
||
|
SPOTTED (S) DOLPHIN
LACROIX; AUDRA DIANE
|
|
|
|
(F)DOLPHIN | REINDEER | OTTER
|
RED WOLF
|
ELEPHANT
|
||
|
REINDEER
LANGNER; SAMUEL LYNN
|
|
|
|
(F)DOLPHIN | (S) DOLPHIN | OTTER
|
RED WOLF
|
ELEPHANT
|
||
|
EAGLE
MARTIN; CONOR BLAKE
|
|
|
|
LION | REINDEER | OTTER
|
RED WOLF
|
FOX
|
||
|
LIONESS
MCCANN; VERONICA BRIEL
|
|
|
|
LION | REINDEER | OTTER
|
TURTLE | FOX
|
||
|
OTTER
NGUYEN; ASHLEY LENHI
|
|
|
|
LION | REINDEER | TIMBER WOLF
|
TURTLE | FOX
|
||
|
TIMBER WOLF
NOVOA; ISABEL MIRANDA
|
|
|
|
LION | REINDEER | (M) DOLPHIN
|
TURTLE | FOX
|
||
|
MALE (M) DOLPHIN
PRUS; JACEK KAZIMIERZ
|
|
|
|
LION | EAGLE
|
TIMBER WOLF
|
TURTLE | FOX
|
||
|
RED WOLF
STEVENSON,
TAYLOR
|
|
|
|
SPIDER | EAGLE
|
TIMBER WOLF
|
TURTLE | HUMMINGBIRD
|
||
|
SEA TURTLE
TOVSON; KEVIN PATRICK
|
|
|
|
SPIDER | EAGLE
|
TIMBER WOLF
|
BEAR
|
|
||
|
BLACK BEAR
WITZ; SARA RAE
|
|
|
|
SPIDER | EAGLE
|
TIMBER WOLF
|
ELEPHANT
|
HUMMINGBIRD | ||
|
ELEPHANT
WONG, SARAH
|
|
|
|
SPIDER | EAGLE
|
(M) DOLPHIN
|
BEAR
|
HUMMINGBIRD | ||
|
FOX
ZHANG; ANNIE DAN.
|
|
|
|
SPIDER | LIONESS
|
(M) DOLPHIN
|
BEAR
|
HUMMINGBIRD |
^= UNITY, COHERENCE, AND FLOW; O= Organization and Logical Order of the Prose,
S= Specificity and "Concreteness": Examples, Verbal Images, Metaphors, Similes, Evidence, Supporting Details;
D= Documentation, PR=Proofreading W = Word Choice, C,= Conciseness
